Thanks for your detailed thoughts. Regarding your point on speed and signals and the risk of being recklessly fast; imo the signal fidelity in the age of privacy will always be a concern so I think, considering the importance of speed, it’s better to react slightly too quickly on perhaps slightly weaker signal then to react too slowly having allowed more signal confidence precisely because so much invisible signal will have happened outside the scope of measurement between these two points - and the deal may be lost in that time.
I see the concern but generally, personally, think it’s better to be bolder and faster precisely because we will never see all the signals
Thanks for sharing mike Hart 😊
For sure Jasper 😊
Thanks for your detailed thoughts. Regarding your point on speed and signals and the risk of being recklessly fast; imo the signal fidelity in the age of privacy will always be a concern so I think, considering the importance of speed, it’s better to react slightly too quickly on perhaps slightly weaker signal then to react too slowly having allowed more signal confidence precisely because so much invisible signal will have happened outside the scope of measurement between these two points - and the deal may be lost in that time.
I see the concern but generally, personally, think it’s better to be bolder and faster precisely because we will never see all the signals